arxiv.org
Ranked #252 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
64.54
Technical Health
80.75Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- Safe to visitStrong
Nothing marks this site as unsafe to visit.
Opportunities
- CrawlabilityPartial
Crawlers can get in, but not everything helps them along: a complete sitemap, working links and pages that are allowed into the index are what to check.
- URL and canonical hygienePartial
URLs are mostly in order; what remains is giving every page one settled address and making missing pages answer as missing.
- Secure connectionPartial
The connection is encrypted but not fully hardened: steering every visit onto it and sending the standard security headers would finish the job.
Content Quality
68.29Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Depth and readabilityStrong
Pages say enough to be useful, in plain language, and stay on the topic their titles promise.
- HeadingsStrong
Each page has one main heading, with subheadings in a sensible order beneath it.
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
Opportunities
- Titles and descriptionsWeak
Titles and descriptions are thin, repeated across pages, or missing, so search results have little to show for each page.
Answer Readiness
16.89Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Opportunities
- Structured dataMissing
Pages carry no structured data, so nothing tells an engine what each one is; marking up the page type, and the site's name, is the first step here.
- Question-and-answer shapeMissing
No page poses a question and answers it directly beneath, which is the shape answer engines look for; adding those pages is where this starts.
- Navigation aidsMissing
Pages give no sign of where they sit in the site; a breadcrumb trail on interior pages, in text and in markup, is the fix.
AI Visibility
71.08Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- Readable without JavaScriptStrong
The content is in the page itself, marked out from the navigation, and written in prose a machine can lift.
Opportunities
- IdentityWeak
Little here says who is behind the site, in the markup or on the pages themselves.
- FeedsMissing
There is no feed and the sitemap carries no dates, so nothing tells a machine when something new appears; a feed is a small addition.
- Authorship and sourcingWeak
Articles rarely say who wrote them or when, and pages rarely link out to sources, which gives an AI little reason to trust them.
Authority
85.70Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
- Social presenceWeak
The site barely points to its presence on other platforms; linking its profiles from the site connects the two.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #251
esa.int64.56
- #252
arxiv.org64.54
- #253
yale.edu64.52
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from arxiv.org's available pages on .