census.gov
Ranked #113 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
75.20
Technical Health
98.42Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
Opportunities
Nothing stands out to work on here.
Content Quality
77.82Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Depth and readabilityStrong
Pages say enough to be useful, in plain language, and stay on the topic their titles promise.
- FreshnessStrong
Something here was published or updated recently, and the site says when.
- LanguageStrong
The page language is declared and matches what is on the page.
Opportunities
- Images and linksPartial
Pages link to one another, though some images lack a description and some link text says "read more" rather than where it leads.
- Titles and descriptionsPartial
Titles are mostly in place; descriptions and link previews are patchier, and each page wants ones of its own.
- HeadingsPartial
Headings are there, but not always one main heading per page or a tidy order of levels beneath it.
Answer Readiness
37.71Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Scannable formattingStrong
Pages open with a short summary and use lists and tables, so an engine can lift the facts without reading everything.
- Navigation aidsStrong
Interior pages show where they sit in the site, and say so in a way engines can read.
Opportunities
- Structured dataMissing
Pages carry no structured data, so nothing tells an engine what each one is; marking up the page type, and the site's name, is the first step here.
- Question-and-answer shapeWeak
Few pages are shaped as questions and answers, so there is little for an answer engine to lift as a direct answer.
AI Visibility
74.23Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- Authorship and sourcingStrong
Articles carry an author and a date, and the content points to its sources.
Opportunities
- IdentityWeak
Little here says who is behind the site, in the markup or on the pages themselves.
- Readable without JavaScriptPartial
Most content is readable without running scripts, but some pages arrive thin, or the content is not clearly marked out from the furniture around it.
- FeedsPartial
Either a feed or sitemap dates are in place, not both; machines that watch for new content want both.
Authority
87.83Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #112
archives.gov75.25
- #113
census.gov75.20
- #114
okta.com75.20
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from census.gov's available pages on .