cmake.org
Ranked #186 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
70.81
Technical Health
96.71Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
Opportunities
Nothing stands out to work on here.
Content Quality
68.68Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
- HeadingsStrong
Each page has one main heading, with subheadings in a sensible order beneath it.
- FreshnessStrong
Something here was published or updated recently, and the site says when.
Opportunities
- Titles and descriptionsWeak
Titles and descriptions are thin, repeated across pages, or missing, so search results have little to show for each page.
- Depth and readabilityPartial
Pages have substance, but many stop short, drift from their titles, or read harder than they need to.
Answer Readiness
49.53Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Scannable formattingStrong
Pages open with a short summary and use lists and tables, so an engine can lift the facts without reading everything.
- Navigation aidsStrong
Interior pages show where they sit in the site, and say so in a way engines can read.
Opportunities
- Structured dataMissing
Pages carry no structured data, so nothing tells an engine what each one is; marking up the page type, and the site's name, is the first step here.
- Question-and-answer shapePartial
Some headings are questions with an answer beneath them; more of them, each followed by a short direct answer, is what an answer engine lifts.
AI Visibility
63.99Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
Opportunities
- IdentityWeak
Little here says who is behind the site, in the markup or on the pages themselves.
- Authorship and sourcingWeak
Articles rarely say who wrote them or when, and pages rarely link out to sources, which gives an AI little reason to trust them.
- Readable without JavaScriptPartial
Most content is readable without running scripts, but some pages arrive thin, or the content is not clearly marked out from the furniture around it.
Authority
75.16Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
- Social presenceStrong
The site links to its profiles on the major platforms.
Opportunities
- TrafficPartial
The site has a real audience, though not yet a large one.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #185
metacritic.com70.82
- #186
cmake.org70.81
- #187
openlibrary.org70.78
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from cmake.org's available pages on .