duke.edu
Ranked #7 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
85.58
Technical Health
92.23Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
- Safe to visitStrong
Nothing marks this site as unsafe to visit.
Opportunities
- SpeedPartial
Pages load reasonably but not quickly, so visitors wait longer than they need to.
- Secure connectionPartial
The connection is encrypted but not fully hardened: steering every visit onto it and sending the standard security headers would finish the job.
Content Quality
77.49Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Depth and readabilityStrong
Pages say enough to be useful, in plain language, and stay on the topic their titles promise.
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
- HeadingsStrong
Each page has one main heading, with subheadings in a sensible order beneath it.
Opportunities
- Titles and descriptionsPartial
Titles are mostly in place; descriptions and link previews are patchier, and each page wants ones of its own.
Answer Readiness
80.65Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Structured dataStrong
Pages carry structured data of the kinds engines use, filled in properly, and the site says its own name in it.
- Question-and-answer shapeStrong
Pages pose the questions people ask and answer them in a paragraph right under the heading.
- Navigation aidsStrong
Interior pages show where they sit in the site, and say so in a way engines can read.
Opportunities
- Scannable formattingPartial
Pages are partly scannable; opening with a short summary, and putting facts in lists and tables, makes them easier to lift from.
AI Visibility
91.58Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- IdentityStrong
It is clear who is behind this site, on its pages, in its markup, and in the public record.
- Authorship and sourcingStrong
Articles carry an author and a date, and the content points to its sources.
Opportunities
- Readable without JavaScriptPartial
Most content is readable without running scripts, but some pages arrive thin, or the content is not clearly marked out from the furniture around it.
Authority
85.94Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #6
techcrunch.com85.82
- #7
duke.edu85.58
- #8
gitlab.com85.16
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from duke.edu's available pages on .