fda.gov
Ranked #77 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
77.76
Technical Health
97.28Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
Opportunities
Nothing stands out to work on here.
Content Quality
75.33Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Titles and descriptionsStrong
Every page has a clear title and a description of its own, and shares well when linked.
- Depth and readabilityStrong
Pages say enough to be useful, in plain language, and stay on the topic their titles promise.
- HeadingsStrong
Each page has one main heading, with subheadings in a sensible order beneath it.
Opportunities
- Images and linksMissing
Pages neither link to one another nor describe their images; linking every page from another, with link text that says where it goes, comes first.
Answer Readiness
55.52Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Navigation aidsStrong
Interior pages show where they sit in the site, and say so in a way engines can read.
Opportunities
- Question-and-answer shapeMissing
No page poses a question and answers it directly beneath, which is the shape answer engines look for; adding those pages is where this starts.
- Scannable formattingPartial
Pages are partly scannable; opening with a short summary, and putting facts in lists and tables, makes them easier to lift from.
- Structured dataPartial
Structured data is partly there: not on every page, not always complete, and not always the types that earn rich results.
AI Visibility
70.53Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- Readable without JavaScriptStrong
The content is in the page itself, marked out from the navigation, and written in prose a machine can lift.
Opportunities
- IdentityWeak
Little here says who is behind the site, in the markup or on the pages themselves.
- Authorship and sourcingPartial
Some articles say who wrote them and when, and some pages cite sources; the rest should say so too.
- FeedsPartial
Either a feed or sitemap dates are in place, not both; machines that watch for new content want both.
Authority
90.12Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #76
google.com77.84
- #77
fda.gov77.76
- #78
shopify.com77.68
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from fda.gov's available pages on .