go.dev
Ranked #245 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
65.84
Technical Health
82.38Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
- Secure connectionStrong
Every visit is encrypted, and the headers that keep it that way are in place.
- Safe to visitStrong
Nothing marks this site as unsafe to visit.
Opportunities
- CrawlabilityPartial
Crawlers can get in, but not everything helps them along: a complete sitemap, working links and pages that are allowed into the index are what to check.
- SpeedPartial
Pages load reasonably but not quickly, so visitors wait longer than they need to.
Content Quality
63.39Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Depth and readabilityStrong
Pages say enough to be useful, in plain language, and stay on the topic their titles promise.
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
- HeadingsStrong
Each page has one main heading, with subheadings in a sensible order beneath it.
Opportunities
- Titles and descriptionsWeak
Titles and descriptions are thin, repeated across pages, or missing, so search results have little to show for each page.
- FreshnessMissing
Nothing here is recently dated, or dated at all; a date on each article, and something new to date, would change that.
Answer Readiness
42.40Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Scannable formattingStrong
Pages open with a short summary and use lists and tables, so an engine can lift the facts without reading everything.
Opportunities
- Structured dataMissing
Pages carry no structured data, so nothing tells an engine what each one is; marking up the page type, and the site's name, is the first step here.
- Question-and-answer shapePartial
Some headings are questions with an answer beneath them; more of them, each followed by a short direct answer, is what an answer engine lifts.
- Navigation aidsPartial
Some interior pages show where they sit in the site; the rest would benefit from the same trail.
AI Visibility
63.35Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- Readable without JavaScriptStrong
The content is in the page itself, marked out from the navigation, and written in prose a machine can lift.
Opportunities
- IdentityWeak
Little here says who is behind the site, in the markup or on the pages themselves.
- Authorship and sourcingWeak
Articles rarely say who wrote them or when, and pages rarely link out to sources, which gives an AI little reason to trust them.
- FeedsMissing
There is no feed and the sitemap carries no dates, so nothing tells a machine when something new appears; a feed is a small addition.
Authority
77.70Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- Social presenceStrong
The site links to its profiles on the major platforms.
Opportunities
- TrafficPartial
The site has a real audience, though not yet a large one.
- Domain historyPartial
The domain has some years behind it, and every year adds to that.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #244
umass.edu65.95
- #245
go.dev65.84
- #246
kyoto-u.ac.jp65.17
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from go.dev's available pages on .