st-andrews.ac.uk
Ranked #82 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
77.59
Technical Health
92.27Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- Secure connectionStrong
Every visit is encrypted, and the headers that keep it that way are in place.
Opportunities
- URL and canonical hygienePartial
URLs are mostly in order; what remains is giving every page one settled address and making missing pages answer as missing.
Content Quality
59.03Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
- LanguageStrong
The page language is declared and matches what is on the page.
Opportunities
- Titles and descriptionsWeak
Titles and descriptions are thin, repeated across pages, or missing, so search results have little to show for each page.
- Depth and readabilityPartial
Pages have substance, but many stop short, drift from their titles, or read harder than they need to.
- FreshnessPartial
The newest dated content here is not that recent; publishing or updating something, and dating it, keeps the site looking alive.
Answer Readiness
73.39Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Structured dataStrong
Pages carry structured data of the kinds engines use, filled in properly, and the site says its own name in it.
- Scannable formattingStrong
Pages open with a short summary and use lists and tables, so an engine can lift the facts without reading everything.
- Navigation aidsStrong
Interior pages show where they sit in the site, and say so in a way engines can read.
Opportunities
- Question-and-answer shapePartial
Some headings are questions with an answer beneath them; more of them, each followed by a short direct answer, is what an answer engine lifts.
AI Visibility
83.57Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- IdentityStrong
It is clear who is behind this site, on its pages, in its markup, and in the public record.
- FeedsStrong
The site offers a feed, and its sitemap says when pages last changed.
Opportunities
- Authorship and sourcingWeak
Articles rarely say who wrote them or when, and pages rarely link out to sources, which gives an AI little reason to trust them.
- Readable without JavaScriptPartial
Most content is readable without running scripts, but some pages arrive thin, or the content is not clearly marked out from the furniture around it.
Authority
79.70Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #81
smithsonianmag.com77.59
- #82
st-andrews.ac.uk77.59
- #83
paypal.com77.54
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from st-andrews.ac.uk's available pages on .