ubuntu.com
Ranked #2 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
87.20
Technical Health
96.83Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
Opportunities
Nothing stands out to work on here.
Content Quality
89.68Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Titles and descriptionsStrong
Every page has a clear title and a description of its own, and shares well when linked.
- Depth and readabilityStrong
Pages say enough to be useful, in plain language, and stay on the topic their titles promise.
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
Opportunities
Nothing stands out to work on here. The most room left is in Depth and readability.
Answer Readiness
70.04Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Structured dataStrong
Pages carry structured data of the kinds engines use, filled in properly, and the site says its own name in it.
- Scannable formattingStrong
Pages open with a short summary and use lists and tables, so an engine can lift the facts without reading everything.
Opportunities
- Question-and-answer shapePartial
Some headings are questions with an answer beneath them; more of them, each followed by a short direct answer, is what an answer engine lifts.
- Navigation aidsMissing
Pages give no sign of where they sit in the site; a breadcrumb trail on interior pages, in text and in markup, is the fix.
AI Visibility
92.45Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- IdentityStrong
It is clear who is behind this site, on its pages, in its markup, and in the public record.
- Readable without JavaScriptStrong
The content is in the page itself, marked out from the navigation, and written in prose a machine can lift.
Opportunities
- Authorship and sourcingPartial
Some articles say who wrote them and when, and some pages cite sources; the rest should say so too.
- FeedsPartial
Either a feed or sitemap dates are in place, not both; machines that watch for new content want both.
Authority
87.00Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #1
engadget.com87.47
- #2
ubuntu.com87.20
- #3
heroku.com86.64
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from ubuntu.com's available pages on .