un.org
Ranked #203 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
69.84
Technical Health
81.03Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- Secure connectionStrong
Every visit is encrypted, and the headers that keep it that way are in place.
- Safe to visitStrong
Nothing marks this site as unsafe to visit.
Opportunities
- CrawlabilityPartial
Crawlers can get in, but not everything helps them along: a complete sitemap, working links and pages that are allowed into the index are what to check.
- URL and canonical hygienePartial
URLs are mostly in order; what remains is giving every page one settled address and making missing pages answer as missing.
- SpeedPartial
Pages load reasonably but not quickly, so visitors wait longer than they need to.
Content Quality
65.14Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- Images and linksStrong
Images are described in text, and pages link to each other with links that say where they go.
Opportunities
- Depth and readabilityPartial
Pages have substance, but many stop short, drift from their titles, or read harder than they need to.
- HeadingsWeak
Pages lack a main heading, or the headings they have are out of order; a page's structure should be readable from its headings alone.
- Titles and descriptionsPartial
Titles are mostly in place; descriptions and link previews are patchier, and each page wants ones of its own.
Answer Readiness
42.87Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Question-and-answer shapeStrong
Pages pose the questions people ask and answer them in a paragraph right under the heading.
- Scannable formattingStrong
Pages open with a short summary and use lists and tables, so an engine can lift the facts without reading everything.
Opportunities
- Structured dataMissing
Pages carry no structured data, so nothing tells an engine what each one is; marking up the page type, and the site's name, is the first step here.
- Navigation aidsMissing
Pages give no sign of where they sit in the site; a breadcrumb trail on interior pages, in text and in markup, is the fix.
AI Visibility
67.69Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- AI accessStrong
AI crawlers are allowed in, and pages may be quoted in AI answers.
- Authorship and sourcingStrong
Articles carry an author and a date, and the content points to its sources.
Opportunities
- IdentityWeak
Little here says who is behind the site, in the markup or on the pages themselves.
- Readable without JavaScriptPartial
Most content is readable without running scripts, but some pages arrive thin, or the content is not clearly marked out from the furniture around it.
- FeedsMissing
There is no feed and the sitemap carries no dates, so nothing tells a machine when something new appears; a feed is a small addition.
Authority
92.47Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #202
astro.build69.91
- #203
un.org69.84
- #204
lse.ac.uk69.82
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from un.org's available pages on .