cnn.com
Ranked #213 of 300 on the Leaderboard. Analyzed .
Index Quotient
69.45
Technical Health
96.17Whether search engines can fetch, trust, and quickly load the site.
Strengths
- CrawlabilityStrong
Crawlers are welcome here: a sitemap points the way, links work, and pages are allowed into the index.
- SpeedStrong
Pages load quickly, and the server answers fast.
- URL and canonical hygieneStrong
URLs are clean and consistent, each page has one address, and missing pages say so.
Opportunities
Nothing stands out to work on here.
Content Quality
46.01Whether pages say clearly what they are about, in a form machines can read.
Strengths
- FreshnessStrong
Something here was published or updated recently, and the site says when.
- LanguageStrong
The page language is declared and matches what is on the page.
Opportunities
- Depth and readabilityMissing
Pages carry almost no readable text, so there is nothing for search engines or answer engines to work with; writing real content is the whole job here.
- HeadingsWeak
Pages lack a main heading, or the headings they have are out of order; a page's structure should be readable from its headings alone.
- Images and linksMissing
Pages neither link to one another nor describe their images; linking every page from another, with link text that says where it goes, comes first.
Answer Readiness
60.29Whether content is shaped and marked up so an engine can lift a direct answer.
Strengths
- Structured dataStrong
Pages carry structured data of the kinds engines use, filled in properly, and the site says its own name in it.
Opportunities
- Question-and-answer shapeWeak
Few pages are shaped as questions and answers, so there is little for an answer engine to lift as a direct answer.
- Scannable formattingMissing
Nothing here is formatted to be scanned: no lists, no tables, and openings that do not summarize; a summary up top and facts in lists is the place to start.
- Navigation aidsWeak
Few pages show their place in the site, so engines see pages rather than a structure.
AI Visibility
51.77Whether AI systems can reach, read, and confidently identify the site.
Strengths
- IdentityStrong
It is clear who is behind this site, on its pages, in its markup, and in the public record.
- Authorship and sourcingStrong
Articles carry an author and a date, and the content points to its sources.
Opportunities
- Readable without JavaScriptMissing
Pages arrive empty until scripts run, so a crawler that does not run them sees nothing; putting the content in the page itself comes first.
- AI accessWeak
Most AI crawlers are turned away, or pages forbid being quoted, which keeps the site out of AI answers.
- FeedsPartial
Either a feed or sitemap dates are in place, not both; machines that watch for new content want both.
Authority
93.01Whether the wider web vouches for the site.
Strengths
- BacklinksStrong
Plenty of other sites link here, including ones that matter.
- TrafficStrong
The site has a large audience.
- Domain historyStrong
The domain has a long history, and history counts.
Opportunities
Nothing here to work on. The points left are the ones only the web's largest sites earn.
Nearby on the Leaderboard
- #212
asu.edu69.47
- #213
cnn.com69.45
- #214
cornell.edu69.44
Scores reflect what IndexBot could read from cnn.com's available pages on .